meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | Oct 4 '12 at 5:04 | |
| stats | profile views | 11 |
|
Sep 26 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Aug 24 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? Thanks! I thought this is a very interesting way to phrase it! +1! :) |
|
Apr 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 9 |
accepted | How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? Thanks for the list of variants! +1! Just a question, will "re-experience" reads confusing since I already have another "experience" in the sentence? Also, I am little confuse by the meaning of "re-experience". |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? @NeilFein I believe this is more of a style question. The question is that I am not sure how this phrase/idea can be incorporated into a sentence. The quote that I had is an example of how I have used it but am not happy with my style of incorporating the phrase. Thus, I am making a question here to know about other ways(or styles) of incorporating this phrase into the sentence. So, I believe I'm making more of a style rather critique question? I edited my question a little to hopefully clear up the doubt. Thanks! |
|
Apr 8 |
revised |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? added 97 characters in body |
|
Apr 8 |
revised |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? added 51 characters in body |
|
Apr 8 |
revised |
How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? added 6 characters in body |
|
Apr 8 |
asked | How to use “I think, therefore I am” in a more fluent manner? |
|
Apr 1 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Apr 1 |
accepted | Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? |
|
Apr 1 |
comment |
Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? These are very, very, very helpful ideas! I suddenly got so excited to rework on the concept with your ideas after getting stuck for so long! It's really great! Thank you so much!! +1!! |
|
Apr 1 |
comment |
Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? Thanks, you have understood it correctly. |
|
Mar 31 |
revised |
Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? added 60 characters in body |
|
Mar 31 |
revised |
Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? reclarified |
|
Mar 31 |
revised |
Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? added 86 characters in body |
|
Mar 31 |
asked | Is calling this process a “convergence” accurate and clear? |
|
Mar 12 |
accepted | Describing a machine's world in a metaphorical manner |
