Take the 2-minute tour ×
Writers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When I first started focusing on short stories, I submitted to a range of top professional magazines (Clarkesworld, Strange Horizons, etc.). I wasn't surprised to be rejected, but now I wonder if after rejecting a few pieces from me, they will attach a negative note or connotation to my name that could hurt future submissions. Obviously I don't/won't submit work that I don't think is ready for the world, but hopefully my future work will become increasingly better. Is there a benefit to holding off top-tier submissions until some time in the future?

share|improve this question
3  
They would need a whole IT department just for maintaining that "connotation" database. Can you imagine how many stories these people reject each day? Do you really think they bother to store and maintain these rejection? Don't you think they have better things to do? No one puts you on a black list. Well, at least as long as you do not threat them ;) –  John Smithers Mar 2 '13 at 23:25
1  
Agree with John. The sad truth of the world is, no one cares about you (the Universal you, not the personal you) :) –  Shantnu Tiwari Mar 3 '13 at 1:12
    
I guess it's comforting that even if my current, favorite literary flourishes seem embarrassing to me in the future, no one will remember them. :-) –  Anna M Mar 3 '13 at 19:02
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, don't hold stories back unless you have a specific reason. Unless a publication specifically asks you to re-submit a specific piece at a later time (maybe they have a theme issue planned), holding stories back makes little sense. There's no secret to getting published aside from (1) Write beautiful things (2) send the beautiful things to publications that things like the things you wrote. (i.e., send to appropriate markets and follow their submission guidelines.)

The stories that you send in should be the best you're capable of at that time. Why would you hold work back unless you think it's not ready? By saving top-shelf material for later, you'll all but ensure that you're not giving your best stories a chance to be noticed. And it's expected that writers will improve over time.

If you were rejected with a form letter, they may not even remember you. If you were rejected with a personalized note, it's because they want to encourage you. If you send in a better story later, and they remember you, they'd almost certainly love to see that you've improved.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Absolutely not. Getting rejected is all part of the business. Just because they don't like one - or maybe several - of your stories doesn't mean they won't find one that they love in the future. Keep submitting and keep dreaming. You'll get there in time.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.