Tell me more ×
Writers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sometimes I see stuff like this:

X said, "..."

"..." X did this, and then said, "..."

Is it used to just vary sentence structure? Or to make dialogue more readable or smoother in certain situations?

share|improve this question

3 Answers

Yes to both. Repetitive sentence structure grates on the ear. Also, sometimes it helps to clarify the speaker before the dialogue, and sometimes you actually want action or a pause to occur before the speech, but not separate from it.

share|improve this answer

Yes to both as Lauren said, and once you train the reader that you're a nice author who doesn't ever violate "One speaker per line" and sticks to that while mixing emotes and actions in too, you may go with a third form which is then even more smooth:

"..." X did this, "..."

Take:

Kim shook his fist and muttered, "Not you too, bastard!"
"So..." Josh raised his gun and said, "are we going to do it the easy way?"

versus

Kim shook his fist. "Not you too, bastard!"
"So..." Josh raised his gun. "Are we going to do it the easy way?"

It's the actions that describe the speaker, and you kill two birds with one stone, give variety against "he said, she said" and get the scene to live for real.

share|improve this answer
+1 for nice examples. – Lauren Ipsum Feb 6 at 14:07
@SF. I do use X did this. "..." and "..." X did this. "..." regularly. It's just that sometimes I wonder if I can omit X said, "..." completely. – alexchenco Feb 6 at 14:51
@alexchenco Yes, as long as it's clear who is speaking, you can omit the dialogue tag X said completely. Not in every instance, of course. – Lauren Ipsum Feb 6 at 15:44

The second example just inserts the tag in the middle of speech, which is fairly standard if redundant. The first example though...

If you're asking for the reason for this ordering - it's a matter of personal style. In literary writing it feels awkward and is rarely used... mostly by unskilled authors, because they don't know any better.

Now first, why they (the unskilled authors) write it like that, and when would skilled authors use this is how natural speech follows:

So, I went to Lucy and she said 'Mary has the keys'

You told me "It's not important."

He said "Yes".

You said it's here.

Contrast it with what you'd find in books:

I went to Lucy and asked her. "Mary has the keys," she answered.

"It's not important," you tell me.

"Yes", he said.

It was supposed to be here, according to what you said.

If, in normal conversation, you report someone's speech, you first identify the speaker, then follow up either with the quote or a paraphrase. So, if you want to create this impression - of the narrator talking directly to the reader, then you'll use this ordering. It contrasts standard literary narration with conversational tone, removes the impersonal distance of the narrator.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.