Take the 2-minute tour ×
Writers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm writing a romance novel and have hit a brick wall. The problem is every way I think the future lovebirds could meet and become friends is totally cliché. After thinking about it, I've realized that the problem lays with the two soon-to-be lovebirds. Neither one is the "player" type. The boy is shy and doesn't flirt, though the girl mistakes his kindness for flirting at first. And the girl is the kind that doesn't date or even feel butterflies because of past pain. If that makes sense.

Anyways, my question is, what should I do when my characters and plot disagree with each other without changing my characters personalities? (my plot is 95% written, only this small part remains)

Or is it really that bad to have one cliché in a book if the rest is largely original?

Thanks for any help and advice!

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Romance itself is a cliche, really (and this is coming from a Romance author), so I wouldn't worry too much about fighting for originality. Find a way to write the cliche in an interesting way, and get going.

That said, Romance is also all about characters and characterization, and you can't afford to violate that in the service of plot. If it isn't believable to have your characters do a certain thing, then they should absolutely not do it.

So I'm not quite sure what you're looking for, here. If the characters are shy and/or damaged, then I expect most of your plot revolves around getting them out of their shells, letting them learn to trust each other, etc. Having them meet in a way that doesn't fit with that will violate your entire story, not just a small part.

So, meeting in a cliche way? - okay, just write it well and give it what freshness you can. Meeting in an out-of-character way? - hell, no.

Good luck with it!

share|improve this answer

Let me see if I've got this right:

You've got two characters who are telling you what to do (or what not to do). And you think that's a problem? Writing believable characters who want to write the story for you is a goal that many would-be writers never achieve. Congratulations!

My suggestion would be to write the story anyway. Listen to your characters. Do what they tell you to do. Your plot is 95% written? Well, maybe not so much if you do this.

The book may not be a romance when you're done. Perhaps it will be about a missed opportunity. But wasting strong characters would be a terrible thing.

(This doesn't preclude you from writing another book that is a romance.)

share|improve this answer
2  
Wish I could give this two votes! Listen to your characters! –  Steven Drennon Dec 17 '11 at 16:04

"If all else fails, chase your hero up a tree and throw rocks at him." (I don't know the source of the quote, but it's catchy.)

Introduce a disaster. Car crash, random passerby collapses, dog gets loose and digs up the yard, kid gets lost and knocks on the door for help. One or both of your characters get drawn into the drama, willingly or not. They meet.

share|improve this answer

I agree with Kate. The key selling point here is about your characters and who they are - audiences will overlook bucketloads of cliches if they care about the characters and are genuinely rooting for them to get together. This, of course, involves staying true to who they are and not giving the reader a jarring experience by making them wonder why the hell Character X is doing something.

I would say the true payoff is in the journey they take after they meet, so don't worry too much about the meeting being cliched and make the growing relationship and the eventual getting together memorable.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.