Also, why has it spawned an award for bad writing?
|
migrated from english.stackexchange.com Mar 22 '11 at 14:57
|
It's an unsubtle cheat. (That doesn't necessarily mean it's not good. Bear with me.) The author wants to get across that Really Important Things are Happening. He wants to hook you with the beginning of his book. How does he manage to impart the tremendous significance the reader should be seeing right from the start? Answer: by giving a dramatic, atmospheric, visual. That'll be enough to give readers a striking opening, to get across that Big Stuff Is Happening. It's a cheat, in this case, because the visual really has nothing to do with the story. It's powerful, but irrelevant - the author is invoking the visual just to draw you in, not because it fits the story or is actually significant. And it's unsubtle because he hits you over the head with it. "It was a dark and stormy night" - that's just a hair away from writing "It was a dramatic, suspenseful night," which I think you'll agree would be absurd. The author's trying to tell you the story is significant, and doing so quite bluntly, instead of actually demonstrating its interest and significance. Now, in moderation, those would be legitimate cheats. You can definitely get away with that kind of stuff; often it's to your advantage, as long as the reader doesn't notice outright what you've done. The difficulty is, "Dark and stormy night" is both such an egregious example, and so oft-quoted and overused, that it completely loses its effectiveness on the one hand, and calls fatal attention to its flaws on the other. It's both a cliche (because a stormy night is an effective image) and a useless one (as opposed to cliches which have true power because their core idea is so significant). Others have responded regarding the contest. I don't think that the tiny snippet is the inspiration for the contest; the full paragraph and Bulwer-Lytton's prose in general are to blame for that. |
|||
|
|
|
It's the opening of the novel Paul Clifford by Edward Bulwer-Lytton, which has become a textbook example of purple prose, an overly extravagant writing style. Wikipedia: It was a dark and stormy night The phrase is used repeatedly by Snoopy in his efforts to start a novel, and the final result is naturally an example of purple prose. |
|||
|
|
|
Although the traditional pointer is to Edward Bulwer-Lytton's purple prose, it may be better known in Britain as a school playground story for the unimaginative which starts something like
but sadly I do not have enough space here to finish it. |
|||||
|
|
The opening sentence is bad for a number of reasons. First, aren't all nights dark? Why say that? But it is not so bad that a good writer couldn't have recovered from it and gone on to write a good book. This author did not, however. His works are regarded by most critics as terrible. Pretty much no one but grad students in English reads a novel like Paul Clifford today. The contest you refer to is the Bulwer-Lytton contest.
Anything that is so universally mocked you would probably be wise to avoid, unless you are entering such a contest. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
There's nothing wrong with it as an opening. Children in particular love it and I salute Bulwer-Lytton who with this short phrase has achieved what other writers have failed to do in many volumes of published work. He lives on after his death and people are talking about him and his work to this day. |
|||||
|
|
It gives you no sense of character or urgency or anything. In my opinion, it is just not intriguing to start a story with the weather. |
|||
|
|
|
One problem is that the sentence is heavy-handed and melodramatic. The dark is a metaphor. The storm is a metaphor. Yeah, yeah, we get it. We're in for a dark and stormy story. Madeleine L'Engle begins A Wrinke in Time with It was a dark and stormy night. I haven't read it, but I suspect she uses the sentence playfully, deliberately tapping into its long association with heavy-handed melodrama. |
|||||||||
|