Take the 2-minute tour ×
Writers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sometimes when I write a plot I get confused about the motivations of the characters and how events connect as I change elements.

Is it a good idea to write a summary first in order to organise things in a simple way? And then writing the actual novel?

share|improve this question
    
======Yes====== –  John Smithers Mar 16 '11 at 9:09
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Yes.

Write the summary.

Write an outline.

Write it on notecards so you can rearrange things and reconnect elements in different ways. Use string.

Write up briefs of your characters. Know their backgrounds, their personalities, motivations, likes and dislikes, fears and loves. "Brief" is a misnomer.

Otherwise you don't have a novel. You have logorrhea.

share|improve this answer
    
What do you mean by "Use string."? –  srcspider Mar 16 '11 at 13:14
    
@Lauren Ipsum Do you mean a string to connect the notecards together? –  Alexandro Chen Mar 16 '11 at 13:21
    
That's exactly what I mean. If you want to connect events, literally connect them. Punch a hole in the card, tie a string to it, and run the string to another card. You can do this for as many holes as the card has room to punch. Then when you move an event from the beginning to the middle, or if you remove something, you can see without question what else is affected. –  Lauren Ipsum Mar 16 '11 at 15:16
    
@Lauren Ipsum I see I will try (I really thought 'the strings' was a metaphor). –  Alexandro Chen Mar 16 '11 at 17:28
    
Or you can use Scrivener and do everything Lauren suggested right there. =P –  Ralph Gallagher Mar 16 '11 at 18:08
show 2 more comments

Couldn't agree more with the "use string" tip. I use a big A1 sheet of cardboard, little Post-It notes, and lengths of ribbon to join things together. Don't know quite how I'd figure a plot out without it!

share|improve this answer
add comment

Some writers are outliners. Some writing advisors are adamant that outlining is necessary.

Other writers are "discovery writers," because one of the reasons they're writing is to discover something (the story, the characters, what the author really thinks about some theme, etc.). Also known as "pantsers," because they write "by the seat of their pants." Also known as "organic" writers. In my experience, discovery writers tend not to be so adamant that it's the only way to write. But they do say, "If you aren't surprising yourself, how are you going to surprise the reader?"

A few years ago, Richard North Patterson was reading and answering questions at my local Borders. I loved the string of books he wrote in the middle of his career, so I went to see him. In response to a question from the audience, he said, "Writing without knowing where you are going and how you are going to get there is authorial malpractice." Alas, he has published two novels since then, and I guessed the "surprise" ending to each about 20 pages in.

On the other hand, I've started three novels without knowing the ending. I've written 50,000 words on each (can you guess in which month I did my writing? ;-), and I still don't have an ending for any of them. I did outline the beginnings, and found that there were plenty of ways to surprise myself as I wrote the scenes.

Stephen King is famous for being an organic writer. Some readers say that's obvious from some of King's endings. But you gotta admit that whatever he's doing is working for him.

What will work for you? Dunno. It's a good idea to try outlining at least once, to see how it works for you.

I generally outline at the scene level: One "card" per scene. (I use Scrivener for this, but you can use physical cards or any other way to capture and organize scene ideas.)

Whether you outline or not, try sketching out each scene before you write it (perhaps immediately before you write it). Before I write a scene, I usually know:

  • the viewpoint character
  • what the viewpoint character wants, and why they want that—i.e. how it relates to their larger story goal
  • who opposes the viewpoint character
  • what that opponent wants, and why they want that
  • the outcome of the conflict—usually the viewpoint character doesn't get what they want; often they end up even worse off than at the start of the scene

That's enough guidance to keep me focused. Related to your question, this sketch makes the characters' motivations clear. At the same time, I usually don't know the details of how each character will go about trying to get what they want. So the sketch leaves plenty of room for me to surprise myself as I write.

share|improve this answer
    
I like the bit about surprise. Many (or many of those I like?) authors claim that their characters did or started to do things they (the authors) didn't expect. I like that, and I like it in my own writing, but then I'm not really a planner, in whatever I do. –  Jürgen A. Erhard Mar 18 '11 at 17:33
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.