Take the 2-minute tour ×
Writers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for authors, editors, reviewers, professional writers, and aspiring writers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The misery of a self-didactic literary analysis lies with its perpetuity. One can go on and on and on, especially when a thesis is on the line. Besides scoping text and narrative for examples to correspond with one's choice of critical approach,* how does one know when to stop? A close reading of even a short story, let alone a novel, can become a hydra. Garnered requirements seem to be the following, but is a category missing? - Theme - Structure - Style - Discussion sifted through a specific critical approach*

Thank you for learned opinions and knowledge of the discipline. (*maybe say, a "Bakhtinian analysis" or a "feminist analysis".)

share|improve this question
2  
I'm afraid this calls for writing advice, which is off-topic here. It might be welcomed at Writers; but to my mind it is a matter which should be taken up with your thesis advisor. –  StoneyB Jan 11 at 12:34
    
This question appears to be off-topic because it is not about English. –  MετάEd Jan 11 at 16:31
2  
What exactly are you writing? A "critique" (in a newspaper?) is not the same as a dissertation (for a Ph.D.) or an analysis (in a journal paper). Could you give some more details on what exactly you want to do? –  what Jan 13 at 11:23
add comment

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Jan 12 at 23:19

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

1 Answer

Generally the approach is to present one idea per academic paper. You have one basic hypothesis, and one method to test it. If you have more methods to try, you present those experiments in other papers. If you have more hypotheses, you test them in other papers.

In the natural sciences you usually find that a research team publishes a string of papers on the same research topic (e.g. time perception). In literary studies you can both find a scholar testing the applicability of one method (e.g. feminist reading) to a wide variety of texts, as well as a scholar applying a variety of methods to one text or corpus (e.g. a specific author or literary epoch or even an outstanding single work).

A monograph can then be a collection of all results that you and/or your fellow researchers found. The theme of the monograph can be defined by a methodology, a genre, an author, an epoch, etc., or a combination of these.

Scientific progress is cumulative. No one expects one scholar to fathom the complete width and breadth of one topic.

In my time, the criterion for the success of a scholarly dissertation was that it had to present new insights and contribute something new to its field. The best way to learn about the scope of a dissertation, is to read other dissertations, ideally from the same field you work in. The closer their topic and methodology to your own, the better. And read the original dissertations, not the re-written versions published as books.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.